Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking686not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.47no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameDG1TU106
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date31 October 2020 (5 years ago)27 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681920 ×2
Core clock speed300 MHz945 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHz1380 MHz
Number of transistorsno data10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate79.20165.6 ×2
Floating-point processing power2.534 TFLOPS5.299 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs2464 ×2
TMUs48120 ×2
Tensor Coresno data240 ×2
Ray Tracing Coresno data30 ×2
L1 Cacheno data1.9 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB4 MB
L3 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR4XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB ×2
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed2133 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth68.26 GB/s336.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 October 2020 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 10 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 160 Watt

Iris Xe MAX Graphics has an age advantage of 1 year, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 540% lower power consumption.

RTX 3000 X2 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a notebook graphics card while Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 284 votes

Rate Iris Xe MAX Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Xe MAX Graphics or Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.