GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking706not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.65no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameDG1GT218
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date31 October 2020 (5 years ago)17 April 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76816
Core clock speed300 MHz520 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data260 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate79.204.160
Floating-point processing power2.534 TFLOPS0.03936 TFLOPS
ROPs244
TMUs488
L2 Cache1024 KB32 KB
L3 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCI
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR4XDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2133 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth68.26 GB/s8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 October 2020 17 April 2007
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 10 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 40 Watt

Iris Xe MAX Graphics has an age advantage of 13 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe MAX Graphics and GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 285 votes

Rate Iris Xe MAX Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 13 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Xe MAX Graphics or GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.