CMP 100HX-210 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking687not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.47no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameDG1GV100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date31 October 2020 (5 years ago)2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7685120
Core clock speed300 MHz555 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHz1147 MHz
Number of transistorsno data21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate79.20367.0
Floating-point processing power2.534 TFLOPS11.75 TFLOPS
ROPs24128
TMUs48320
Tensor Coresno data640
L1 Cacheno data7.5 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB6 MB
L3 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 1.0 x1
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR4XHBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed2133 MHz810 MHz
Memory bandwidth68.26 GB/s829.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA-7.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 10 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 250 Watt

Iris Xe MAX Graphics has a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

CMP 100HX-210, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe MAX Graphics and CMP 100HX-210. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a notebook graphics card while CMP 100HX-210 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210
CMP 100HX-210

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 283 votes

Rate Iris Xe MAX Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 9 votes

Rate CMP 100HX-210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Xe MAX Graphics or CMP 100HX-210, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.