Tesla PG503-216 vs Iris Xe Graphics MAX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking686not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.49no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameDG1GV100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date31 October 2020 (5 years ago)26 November 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7684608
Core clock speedno data1312 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHz1530 MHz
Number of transistorsno data21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate79.20440.6
Floating-point processing power2.534 TFLOPS14.1 TFLOPS
ROPs24128
TMUs48288
Tensor Coresno data640
L1 Cacheno data10 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR4XHBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed4.3 GB/s1106 MHz
Memory bandwidth68.26 GB/s1.13 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA-7.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 October 2020 26 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 10 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 250 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics MAX has an age advantage of 11 months, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

Tesla PG503-216, on the other hand, has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe Graphics MAX and Tesla PG503-216. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics MAX is a desktop graphics card while Tesla PG503-216 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
NVIDIA Tesla PG503-216
Tesla PG503-216

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 246 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics MAX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 7 votes

Rate Tesla PG503-216 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Xe Graphics MAX or Tesla PG503-216, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.