GMA 3150 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4951599
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XePineview
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 August 2020 (5 years ago)9 May 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9616
Core clock speedno data400 MHz
Number of transistorsno data123 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data13 Watt
Texture fill rateno data0.8
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCI

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4System Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_19.0c
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45 no data
Far Cry 5 30−35 no data
Fortnite 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 no data
Valorant 90−95 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150 no data
Dota 2 70−75 no data
Far Cry 5 30−35 no data
Fortnite 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40 no data
Metro Exodus 18−20 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 no data
Valorant 90−95 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45 no data
Dota 2 70−75 no data
Far Cry 5 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14 no data
Metro Exodus 10−12 no data
Valorant 100−110 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27 no data
Far Cry 5 20−22 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 20−22 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22 no data
Metro Exodus 5−6 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 no data
Valorant 50−55 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14 no data
Dota 2 35−40 no data
Far Cry 5 10−11 no data
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2020 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 10 nm 45 nm

Iris Xe Graphics G7 has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe Graphics G7 and GMA 3150. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7
Intel GMA 3150
GMA 3150

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 3130 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 174 votes

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Xe Graphics G7 or GMA 3150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.