Tesla C870 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking535not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.38no data
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeG80
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 August 2020 (5 years ago)2 May 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96128
Core clock speed400 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data681 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt171 Watt
Texture fill rateno data38.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3456 TFLOPS
ROPsno data24
TMUsno data32
L2 Cacheno data96 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data1536 MB
Memory bus widthno data384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_111.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2020 2 May 2007
Chip lithography 10 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 171 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs has an age advantage of 13 years, a 800% more advanced lithography process, and 510.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Tesla C870. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a notebook graphics card while Tesla C870 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
NVIDIA Tesla C870
Tesla C870

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1106 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tesla C870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs or Tesla C870, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.