ATI Radeon 7000 Mac Edition vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking538not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.61no data
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeRV100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 August 2020 (5 years ago)14 March 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed400 MHz183 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data30 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rateno data0.55
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data3

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data32 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data183 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.928 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_17.0
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2020 14 March 2004
Chip lithography 10 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 23 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs has an age advantage of 16 years, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 7000 Mac Edition, on the other hand, has 21.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon 7000 Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 7000 Mac Edition is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
ATI Radeon 7000 Mac Edition
Radeon 7000 Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1131 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 7000 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs or Radeon 7000 Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.