ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking535not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.26no data
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeM82
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 August 2020 (5 years ago)7 January 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9640
Core clock speed400 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data181 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rateno data2.000
Floating-point processing powerno data0.04 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataMXM-II

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR2
Maximum RAM amountno data256 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_110.1
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 25978
+8376%
ATI Mobility HD 3450 307

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2020 7 January 2008
Chip lithography 10 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 12 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

ATI Mobility HD 3450, on the other hand, has 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Mobility Radeon HD 3450. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450
Mobility Radeon HD 3450

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1106 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 8 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs or Mobility Radeon HD 3450, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.