GRID RTX T10-2 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking531not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.09no data
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeTU102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 August 2020 (5 years ago)2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores963584
Core clock speed400 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1395 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rateno data312.5
Floating-point processing powerno data9.999 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data224
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Coresno data56
L1 Cacheno data3.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data672.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 150 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs has a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 435.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and GRID RTX T10-2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a notebook graphics card while GRID RTX T10-2 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10-2
GRID RTX T10-2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1099 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 56 votes

Rate GRID RTX T10-2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs or GRID RTX T10-2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.