ATI Radeon X1600 SE vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code nameTiger Lake GT2RV515
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2 September 2020 (5 years ago)2007 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed300 MHz635 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data107 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt27 Watt
Texture fill rate52.802.540
Floating-point processing power1.69 TFLOPSno data
ROPs244
TMUs484
L2 Cache1024 KBno data
L3 Cache3.75 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared500 MBps
Memory bandwidthno data8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.63.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 27 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU has a 800% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU and Radeon X1600 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X1600 SE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
ATI Radeon X1600 SE
Radeon X1600 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 167 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon X1600 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU or Radeon X1600 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.