CMP 100HX-210 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking586not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency19.81no data
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeGV100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 August 2020 (5 years ago)2020 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores805120
Core clock speed400 MHz555 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1147 MHz
Number of transistorsno data21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data367.0
Floating-point processing powerno data11.75 TFLOPS
ROPsno data128
TMUsno data320
Tensor Coresno data640
L1 Cacheno data7.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x1
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM2
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data4096 Bit
Memory clock speedno data810 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data829.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-7.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 250 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs has a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 792.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs and CMP 100HX-210. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is a notebook graphics card while CMP 100HX-210 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210
CMP 100HX-210

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1116 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 9 votes

Rate CMP 100HX-210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs or CMP 100HX-210, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.