3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking525not rated
Place by popularity48not in top-100
Power efficiency18.69no data
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Voodoo Scalable (2000)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeVSA-101
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80no data
Core clock speed400 MHz143 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data14 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data0.29
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data16 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data143 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.288 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_16.0
OpenGLno data1.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs has a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP, on the other hand, has 86.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs and 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is a notebook card while 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 901 vote

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7 votes

Rate 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.