UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1093
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data7.32
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)no data
GPU code nameTiger Lake GT2Gen. 11
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2 September 2020 (4 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64016
Core clock speed300 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz850 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt4.8 - 10 Watt
Texture fill rate44.00no data
Floating-point processing power1.408 TFLOPSno data
ROPs20no data
TMUs40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing Busno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 September 2020 11 January 2021
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 4 Watt

UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) has an age advantage of 4 months, and 275% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU and UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU is a notebook card while UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
Intel UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU)
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 152 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.