GeForce FX 5200 Ultra vs Iris Xe Graphics G4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1555
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameTiger Lake GT2NV34 A2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2 September 2020 (5 years ago)6 March 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed300 MHz325 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data45 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate26.401.300
Floating-point processing power0.8448 TFLOPSno data
ROPs124
TMUs244
L3 Cache3.75 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1AGP 8x
Lengthno data171 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared325 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data10.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0a
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.5 (2.1)
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 September 2020 6 March 2003
Chip lithography 10 nm 150 nm

Iris Xe Graphics G4 has an age advantage of 17 years, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe Graphics G4 and GeForce FX 5200 Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G4 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce FX 5200 Ultra is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
Iris Xe Graphics G4
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra
GeForce FX 5200 Ultra

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 242 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 7 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5200 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Xe Graphics G4 or GeForce FX 5200 Ultra, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.