RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation vs Iris Xe Graphics 96EU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 12.2 (2022−2023)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameAlder Lake GT1AD104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7685120
Core clock speed300 MHz1110 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHz1545 MHz
Number of transistorsno data35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate67.20247.2
Floating-point processing power2.15 TFLOPS15.82 TFLOPS
ROPs2464
TMUs48160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data432.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2022 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 100 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics 96EU has 122.2% lower power consumption.

RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe Graphics 96EU and RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics 96EU is a desktop card while RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 180 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics 96EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 42 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.