Tesla C1080 vs Iris Xe Graphics 80EU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 12.2 (2022−2023)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameRaptor Lake GT1GT200B
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date4 January 2023 (2 years ago)9 April 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640240
Core clock speed300 MHz610 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt188 Watt
Texture fill rate58.0048.80
Floating-point processing power1.856 TFLOPS0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs2032
TMUs4080
L2 Cache1024 KB256 KB
L3 Cache12 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared512 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data102.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.64.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2023 9 April 2009
Chip lithography 10 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 188 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics 80EU has an age advantage of 13 years, a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 1153.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe Graphics 80EU and Tesla C1080. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics 80EU is a notebook graphics card while Tesla C1080 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU
NVIDIA Tesla C1080
Tesla C1080

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 279 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics 80EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tesla C1080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Xe Graphics 80EU or Tesla C1080, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.