Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking737not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency19.09no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT3eTU104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date5 September 2014 (10 years ago)8 June 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3843072 ×2
Core clock speed300 MHz1035 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz1530 MHz
Number of transistors189 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate38.40293.8 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.6144 TFLOPS9.4 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs664 ×2
TMUs48192 ×2
Tensor Coresno data384 ×2
Ray Tracing Coresno data48 ×2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.801.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 September 2014 8 June 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 110 Watt

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 has 633.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 5000 X2 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile
Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 14 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Pro Graphics P6300 or Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.