Iris Xe Graphics 96EU vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking684not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency19.08no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT3eAlder Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date5 September 2014 (10 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384768
Core clock speed300 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz1400 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate38.4067.20
Floating-point processing power0.6144 TFLOPS2.15 TFLOPS
ROPs624
TMUs4848

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPRing Bus
WidthIGPIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.801.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 September 2014 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 has 200% lower power consumption.

Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 13 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 180 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics 96EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.