Arctic Sound-M vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking763not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency19.40no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT3eArctic Sound
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date5 September 2014 (11 years ago)2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3848192
Core clock speed300 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate38.40230.4
Floating-point processing power0.6144 TFLOPS14.75 TFLOPS
ROPs6128
TMUs48256
L2 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.23 TB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.80N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 500 Watt

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 has 3233% lower power consumption.

Arctic Sound-M, on the other hand, has a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and Arctic Sound-M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is a desktop graphics card while Arctic Sound-M is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 16 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound-M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Pro Graphics P6300 or Arctic Sound-M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.