Arc Pro A40 vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking752not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency19.33no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT3eDG2-128
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date5 September 2014 (11 years ago)8 August 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841024
Core clock speed300 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistors189 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate38.40108.8
Floating-point processing power0.6144 TFLOPS3.482 TFLOPS
ROPs632
TMUs4864
Ray Tracing Coresno data8
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared96 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.801.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 September 2014 8 August 2022
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 has 233.3% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro A40, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and Arc Pro A40. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is a desktop graphics card while Arc Pro A40 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Intel Arc Pro A40
Arc Pro A40

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 16 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 15 votes

Rate Arc Pro A40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Pro Graphics P6300 or Arc Pro A40, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.