Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M SLI

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

GT 755M SLI
8.66
+66.2%

GeForce GT 755M SLI outperforms Iris Pro Graphics P580 by 66% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking458578
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money2.02no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Gen. 9 Skylake (2015−2016)
GPU code nameN14P-?Skylake GT4e
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 November 2013 (10 years old)1 September 2015 (8 years old)
Current price$545 no data
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76872
Core clock speed980 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors2x 1300 Million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2x ~50 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data75.60

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 755M SLI and Iris Pro Graphics P580 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x1

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount2x 2 GB64 GB
Memory bus width2x 128 BiteDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed5400 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkanno data1.1.97
CUDA+no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
+71.4%
21−24
−71.4%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+81.3%
16−18
−81.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+90.9%
10−12
−90.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+76.5%
16−18
−76.5%
Hitman 3 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+46.2%
12−14
−46.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+81.3%
16−18
−81.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+90.9%
10−12
−90.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+76.5%
16−18
−76.5%
Hitman 3 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+46.2%
12−14
−46.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+81.3%
16−18
−81.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+90.9%
10−12
−90.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+76.5%
16−18
−76.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Hitman 3 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Hitman 3 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Battlefield 5 6−7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

This is how GT 755M SLI and Iris Pro Graphics P580 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • GT 755M SLI is 71.4% faster than Iris Pro Graphics P580

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GT 755M SLI is 1200% faster than the Iris Pro Graphics P580.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GT 755M SLI is ahead in 62 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 8.66 5.21
Recency 1 November 2013 1 September 2015
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 15 Watt

The GeForce GT 755M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Pro Graphics P580 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M SLI
GeForce GT 755M SLI
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
Iris Pro Graphics P580

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 21 vote

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 4 votes

Rate Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.