NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT SLI vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

Iris Pro Graphics P580
5.21
+167%

Iris Pro Graphics P580 outperforms GeForce 9800M GT SLI by 167% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking578853
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for moneyno data0.08
ArchitectureGen. 9 Skylake (2015−2016)G9x (2007−2010)
GPU code nameSkylake GT4eNB9E-GT2
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 September 2015 (8 years old)15 July 2008 (15 years old)
Current priceno data$545
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores72192
Core clock speed350 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million1508 Million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate75.60no data

Size and compatibility

Information on Iris Pro Graphics P580 and GeForce 9800M GT SLI compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1no data
SLI optionsno data+

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount64 GB512 MB
Memory bus widtheDRAM + 64/128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Shared memory+-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.1.97no data
CUDAno data+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Hitman 3 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Hitman 3 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Hitman 3 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Hitman 3 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Pro Graphics P580 is 1100% faster than the 9800M GT SLI.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Iris Pro Graphics P580 is ahead in 47 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 5.21 1.95
Recency 1 September 2015 15 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 130 Watt

The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800M GT SLI in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
Iris Pro Graphics P580
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT SLI
GeForce 9800M GT SLI

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 4 votes

Rate Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

This video card has no user ratings yet.

Rate NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.