Radeon RX 5950 XT vs Iris Pro Graphics P555

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameSkylake GT3eNavi 21
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 September 2015 (10 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3845120
Core clock speed350 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1635 MHz
Number of transistors189 million21,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt350 Watt
Texture fill rate48.00523.2
Floating-point processing power0.768 TFLOPS16.74 TFLOPS
ROPs696
TMUs48320

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared24 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared14000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data672.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.1.97-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 350 Watt

Iris Pro Graphics P555 has 2233.3% lower power consumption.

RX 5950 XT, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Pro Graphics P555 and Radeon RX 5950 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Pro Graphics P555
Iris Pro Graphics P555
AMD Radeon RX 5950 XT
Radeon RX 5950 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P555 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 37 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5950 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Pro Graphics P555 or Radeon RX 5950 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.