Radeon HD 7350 PCI vs Iris Pro Graphics 580

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking693not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.32no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameSkylake GT4eCedar
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2015 (10 years ago)5 January 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores57680
Core clock speed350 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt19 Watt
Texture fill rate68.405.200
Floating-point processing power1.094 TFLOPSno data
ROPs94
TMUs728

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCI
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount64 GB512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x HDMI
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 5 January 2012
Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 19 Watt

Iris Pro Graphics 580 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 26.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Radeon HD 7350 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Pro Graphics 580 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 7350 PCI is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
Iris Pro Graphics 580
AMD Radeon HD 7350 PCI
Radeon HD 7350 PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 18 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 53 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7350 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Pro Graphics 580 or Radeon HD 7350 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.