HD Graphics 12EU vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking843not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.19no data
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)Generation 5.75 (2010)
GPU code nameHaswell GT3eIronlake
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date27 May 2013 (12 years ago)10 January 2010 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32096
Core clock speed200 MHz533 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHzno data
Number of transistors392 million177 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate48.006.396
Floating-point processing power0.768 TFLOPS0.1023 TFLOPS
ROPs42
TMUs4012

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceRing BusQPI
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem shared + 128 MB eDRAMSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem sharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentMotherboard Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)10.1
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.32.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2013 10 January 2010
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 35 Watt

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 105% more advanced lithography process.

HD Graphics 12EU, on the other hand, has 29% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and HD Graphics 12EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a notebook graphics card while HD Graphics 12EU is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 190 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 20 votes

Rate HD Graphics 12EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Pro Graphics 5200 or HD Graphics 12EU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.