ATI FireGL 8800 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking764not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.11no data
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameHaswell GT3eR200
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date27 May 2013 (11 years ago)14 August 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed200 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHzno data
Number of transistors392 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattno data
Texture fill rate48.002.400
Floating-point processing power0.768 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs408

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceRing BusAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem shared + 128 MB eDRAMDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared290 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data9.28 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.31.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2013 14 August 2001
Chip lithography 22 nm 150 nm

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 581.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and FireGL 8800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a notebook card while FireGL 8800 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
ATI FireGL 8800
FireGL 8800

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 162 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL 8800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.