Arc 130T Mobile vs Iris Plus Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking720not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.92no data
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)Xe+ (2025)
GPU code nameIce Lake GT2Arrow Lake-H
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data13 January 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512896
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz2200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate32.00123.2
Floating-point processing power1.024 TFLOPS3.942 TFLOPS
ROPs828
TMUs3256
Tensor Coresno data112
Ray Tracing Coresno data7
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics has 133% lower power consumption.

Arc 130T Mobile, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics and Arc 130T Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics is a desktop graphics card while Arc 130T Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 491 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 32 votes

Rate Arc 130T Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Plus Graphics or Arc 130T Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.