Radeon RX 7400 vs Iris Plus Graphics G7

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameIce Lake GT2Navi 33
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 May 2020 (5 years ago)8 August 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121792
Core clock speed300 MHz1452 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt43 Watt
Texture fill rate33.60257.6
Floating-point processing power1.075 TFLOPS16.49 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs32112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.1.971.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 May 2020 8 August 2025
Chip lithography 10 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 43 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics G7 has 186.7% lower power consumption.

RX 7400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics G7 and Radeon RX 7400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics G7 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 7400 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7
Iris Plus Graphics G7
AMD Radeon RX 7400
Radeon RX 7400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 64 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Plus Graphics G7 or Radeon RX 7400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.