Radeon R7 265 vs Iris Plus Graphics G7

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated489
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.70
Power efficiencyno data4.95
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameIce Lake GT2Pitcairn
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date4 May 2020 (5 years ago)13 February 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121024
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1050 MHz925 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate33.6059.20
Floating-point processing power1.075 TFLOPS1.894 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs3264
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1 x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data179.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity-+
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire-+
FreeSync-+
DDMA audiono data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.1.97-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 May 2020 13 February 2014
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 150 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics G7 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics G7 and Radeon R7 265. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics G7 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R7 265 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7
Iris Plus Graphics G7
AMD Radeon R7 265
Radeon R7 265

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 74 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 383 votes

Rate Radeon R7 265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Plus Graphics G7 or Radeon R7 265, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.