Radeon 680M vs Iris Plus Graphics G7

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated338
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.95
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameIce Lake GT2Rembrandt+
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 May 2020 (4 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512768
Core clock speed300 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate33.60105.6
Floating-point processing power1.075 TFLOPS3.379 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs3248
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.1.971.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 May 2020 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 10 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics G7 has 233.3% lower power consumption.

Radeon 680M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics G7 and Radeon 680M. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7
Iris Plus Graphics G7
AMD Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 49 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 950 votes

Rate Radeon 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.