GRID K340 vs Iris Plus Graphics G7

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated817
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.02
Power efficiencyno data0.99
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameIce Lake GT2GK107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date4 May 2020 (5 years ago)23 July 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512384 ×4
Core clock speed300 MHz950 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate33.6030.40 ×4
Floating-point processing power1.075 TFLOPS0.7296 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs88 ×4
TMUs3232 ×4
L1 Cacheno data32 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB ×4
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit ×4
Memory clock speedSystem Shared900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data28.8 GB/s ×4
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.1.971.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 May 2020 23 July 2013
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 225 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics G7 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 1400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics G7 and GRID K340. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics G7 is a notebook graphics card while GRID K340 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7
Iris Plus Graphics G7
NVIDIA GRID K340
GRID K340

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 74 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate GRID K340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Plus Graphics G7 or GRID K340, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.