Radeon R7 350 Fake Card vs Iris Plus Graphics G4

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameIce Lake GT2Opal
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date29 May 2019 (6 years ago)2015 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384384
Core clock speed300 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data950 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate25.2025.20
Floating-point processing power0.8064 TFLOPSno data
ROPs88
TMUs2424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared4.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data36.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.46.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1 (1.2)
Vulkan1.1.971.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics G4 has a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics G4 and Radeon R7 350 Fake Card. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics G4 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R7 350 Fake Card is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4
Iris Plus Graphics G4
AMD Radeon R7 350 Fake Card
Radeon R7 350 Fake Card

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 9 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 12 votes

Rate Radeon R7 350 Fake Card on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Plus Graphics G4 or Radeon R7 350 Fake Card, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.