ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 SE vs Iris Plus Graphics 950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking643not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency30.90no data
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameIce Lake GT2RV280
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno data26 January 2004 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed400 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data36 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate32.001.000
Floating-point processing power1.024 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs324

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1AGP 8x
WidthIGP1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared164 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.624 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA, 2x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.1
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 150 nm

Iris Plus Graphics 950 has a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics 950 and All-In-Wonder 9200 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 12 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 9200 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Plus Graphics 950 or All-In-Wonder 9200 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.