AeroBox GPU vs Iris Plus Graphics 950

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking571not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency29.89no data
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameIce Lake GT2Kryptos
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data13 March 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512896
Core clock speed400 MHz935 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz985 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate32.0055.16
Floating-point processing power1.024 TFLOPS1.765 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs3256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1IGP
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1066 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data68.22 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 100 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 950 has a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics 950 and AeroBox GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics 950 is a desktop card while AeroBox GPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics 950
Iris Plus Graphics 950
AMD AeroBox GPU
AeroBox GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 12 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 679 votes

Rate AeroBox GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.