Radeon 760M vs Iris Plus Graphics 940

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated420
Place by popularitynot in top-10093
Power efficiencyno data66.68
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameIce Lake GT2Phoenix
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno data31 January 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384512
Core clock speed400 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz2599 MHz
Number of transistorsno data25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate24.0083.17
Floating-point processing power0.768 TFLOPS5.323 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2432
Ray Tracing Coresno data8
L0 Cacheno data128 KB
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm

Radeon 760M has a 150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics 940 and Radeon 760M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940
Iris Plus Graphics 940
AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 83 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 940 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 426 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Plus Graphics 940 or Radeon 760M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.