GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh vs Iris Plus Graphics 645

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking727not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.46no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameCoffee Lake GT3eTU106B
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 October 2019 (6 years ago)29 January 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841920
Core clock speed300 MHz960 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistorsno data10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate50.40144.0
Floating-point processing power0.8064 TFLOPS4.608 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs48120
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data30
L1 Cacheno data1.9 MB
L2 Cacheno data3 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1353 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data259.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.2.140
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 October 2019 29 January 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 115 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 645 has an age advantage of 8 months, and 667% lower power consumption.

RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh, on the other hand, has a 17% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 124 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 645 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 60 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Plus Graphics 645 or GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.