ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 775 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 18.28 | no data |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) | Rage 9 (2003−2006) |
| GPU code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | RV370 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 3 January 2017 (9 years ago) | 25 October 2006 (19 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 325 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 189 million | 107 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm++ | 110 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 1.300 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.8448 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 6 | 4 |
| TMUs | 48 | 4 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 128 MB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 300 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 4.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 9.0 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | N/A |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 3 January 2017 | 25 October 2006 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 128 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 110 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30 Watt |
Iris Plus Graphics 640 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 686% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
