B100 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking748not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.99no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Blackwell (2024)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT3eGB102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 January 2017 (8 years ago)November 2024 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38416896 ×2
Core clock speed300 MHz1665 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1837 MHz
Number of transistors189 million104,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt1000 Watt
Texture fill rate52.80969.9 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.8448 TFLOPS62.08 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs624 ×2
TMUs48528 ×2
Tensor Coresno data528 ×2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno dataSXM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4HBM3e
Maximum RAM amount32 GB96 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data4.1 TB/s ×2
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-10.1
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 96 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 1000 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 6566.7% lower power consumption.

B100, on the other hand, has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and B100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a notebook graphics card while B100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Plus Graphics 640
NVIDIA B100
B100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 314 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate B100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Plus Graphics 640 or B100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.