ATI All-In-Wonder X800 XT vs Iris Plus Graphics 640

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking775not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.28no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT3eR420
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 January 2017 (9 years ago)21 September 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$179

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed300 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate52.808.000
Floating-point processing power0.8448 TFLOPSno data
ROPs616
TMUs4816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount32 GB256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data32 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2017 21 September 2004
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 130 nm

Iris Plus Graphics 640 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 829% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and All-In-Wonder X800 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a notebook graphics card while All-In-Wonder X800 XT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 322 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate All-In-Wonder X800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Plus Graphics 640 or All-In-Wonder X800 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.