Radeon RX 5900 XT vs Iris Graphics 550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking773not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.60no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameSkylake GT3eNavi 21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2015 (10 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3844352
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1735 MHz
Number of transistors189 million21,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate48.00471.9
Floating-point processing power0.768 TFLOPS15.1 TFLOPS
ROPs696
TMUs48272

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared14000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data672.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 300 Watt

Iris Graphics 550 has 1900% lower power consumption.

RX 5900 XT, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Graphics 550 and Radeon RX 5900 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Graphics 550 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 5900 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Graphics 550
Iris Graphics 550
AMD Radeon RX 5900 XT
Radeon RX 5900 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 55 votes

Rate Iris Graphics 550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 70 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Graphics 550 or Radeon RX 5900 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.