Radeon Pro WX 8100 vs Iris Graphics 550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking775not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.72no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameSkylake GT3eVega 10
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2015 (10 years ago)3 December 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3843584
Core clock speed300 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors189 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate48.00336.0
Floating-point processing power0.768 TFLOPS10.75 TFLOPS
ROPs664
TMUs48224
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared2048 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent6x mini-DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.31.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 3 December 2017
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 230 Watt

Iris Graphics 550 has 1433.3% lower power consumption.

Pro WX 8100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

We couldn't decide between Iris Graphics 550 and Radeon Pro WX 8100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Graphics 550 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro WX 8100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Graphics 550
Iris Graphics 550
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100
Radeon Pro WX 8100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 55 votes

Rate Iris Graphics 550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Graphics 550 or Radeon Pro WX 8100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.