ATI Radeon 9700 PRO X4 vs Iris Graphics 550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking783not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.81no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameSkylake GT3eR300
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2015 (10 years ago)1 July 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed300 MHz325 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million110 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate48.002.600 ×4
Floating-point processing power0.768 TFLOPSno data
ROPs68 ×4
TMUs488 ×4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCI
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB ×4
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit ×4
Memory clock speedSystem Shared310 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data19.84 GB/s ×4
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DVI

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 1 July 2002
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm

Iris Graphics 550 has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 971% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Graphics 550 and Radeon 9700 PRO X4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Graphics 550 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9700 PRO X4 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 57 votes

Rate Iris Graphics 550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon 9700 PRO X4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Graphics 550 or Radeon 9700 PRO X4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.