GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q vs Iris Graphics 550

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking773not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.55no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameSkylake GT3eGA104
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 September 2015 (10 years ago)12 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3846144
Core clock speed300 MHz780 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1245 MHz
Number of transistors189 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate48.00239.0
Floating-point processing power0.768 TFLOPS15.3 TFLOPS
ROPs696
TMUs48192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cacheno data6 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data384.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 12 January 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 80 Watt

Iris Graphics 550 has 433.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 3080 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Graphics 550 and GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Graphics 550
Iris Graphics 550
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 55 votes

Rate Iris Graphics 550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 41 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Graphics 550 or GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.