ATI Radeon HD 4855 vs Iris Graphics 5100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking975not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.48no data
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameHaswell GT3RV770
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date27 May 2013 (12 years ago)3 January 2010 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320640
Core clock speed200 MHz575 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,300 million956 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate44.0018.40
Floating-point processing power0.704 TFLOPS0.736 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs4032
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data220 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data115.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.33.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2013 3 January 2010
Chip lithography 22 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 110 Watt

Iris Graphics 5100 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 266.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Graphics 5100 and Radeon HD 4855. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Graphics 5100 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 4855 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Graphics 5100
Iris Graphics 5100
ATI Radeon HD 4855
Radeon HD 4855

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 141 votes

Rate Iris Graphics 5100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon HD 4855 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Graphics 5100 or Radeon HD 4855, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.