GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition vs Iris Graphics 5100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking897not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.47no data
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameHaswell GT3G96C
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date27 May 2013 (11 years ago)25 October 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32032
Core clock speed200 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,300 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate44.008.000
Floating-point processing power0.704 TFLOPS0.08 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs4016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusMXM-II
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared792 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.34 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.33.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2013 25 October 2008
Chip lithography 22 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 23 Watt

Iris Graphics 5100 has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

9600M GT Mac Edition, on the other hand, has 30.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Graphics 5100 and GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Graphics 5100 is a desktop card while GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Graphics 5100
Iris Graphics 5100
NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition
GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 105 votes

Rate Iris Graphics 5100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.