Radeon RX Vega 9 vs Ice Lake GT3e
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 670 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 25.88 |
| Architecture | Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) | Vega (2017−2020) |
| GPU code name | Ice Lake GT3e | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | no data | 26 October 2017 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | 576 |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 15 Watt |
| ROPs | 8 | no data |
| TMUs | 32 | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Shared memory | no data | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12_1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Ice Lake GT3e has a 40% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Ice Lake GT3e and Radeon RX Vega 9. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ice Lake GT3e is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 9 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
