AMD Hawaii vs NVIDIA NV18 C1

AMD Hawaii
NVIDIA NV18 C1

General info

Comparison of Hawaii and NV18 C1 architecture, market type and release date.
Place in performance rating
not rated
 
not rated
Architecture
GCN 2.0
 
Celsius
Code name
Hawaii
 
NV18 C1
Type
Desktop
 
Desktop
Release date
n/d
 
n/d

Technical specs

Hawaii and NV18 C1's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Hawaii and NV18 C1's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Pipelines
2816
 
n/d
Transistor count
6,200 million
 
29 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
 
150 nm

API support

APIs supported by Hawaii and NV18 C1, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX
12.0 (12_0)
 
8.0
OpenGL
4.6
 
1.3

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Hawaii and NV18 C1. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
550 Mh/s
 
n/d

Advantages of AMD Hawaii

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 vs 150 nm)

Advantages of NVIDIA NV18 C1

We are unaware of any advantages of NVIDIA NV18 C1 over AMD Hawaii.

So, Hawaii or NV18 C1?

Technical City couldn't decide between AMD Hawaii and NVIDIA NV18 C1. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Hawaii and NV18 C1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite video card.
AMD Hawaii
NVIDIA NV18 C1
Like
Like

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about Hawaii or NV18 C1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.