Radeon R7 240 OEM vs HD Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1201not rated
Place by popularity55not in top-100
Power efficiency1.57no data
ArchitectureGeneration 7.0 (2012−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameIvy Bridge GT1Oland
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 April 2012 (13 years ago)1 November 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48320
Core clock speed650 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz780 MHz
Number of transistors392 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate6.30015.60
Floating-point processing power0.1008 TFLOPS0.4992 TFLOPS
ROPs18
TMUs620

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data28.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.04.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.801.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2012 1 November 2013
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 50 Watt

HD Graphics has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

R7 240 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics and Radeon R7 240 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics
HD Graphics
AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM
Radeon R7 240 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 2734 votes

Rate HD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 51 votes

Rate Radeon R7 240 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics or Radeon R7 240 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.