Radeon Picasso vs HD Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1203not rated
Place by popularity55not in top-100
Power efficiency1.57no data
ArchitectureGeneration 7.0 (2012−2013)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameIvy Bridge GT1Picasso
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 April 2012 (13 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48640
Core clock speed650 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz1301 MHz
Number of transistors392 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate6.30052.04
Floating-point processing power0.1008 TFLOPS1.665 TFLOPS
ROPs18
TMUs640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.04.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.80-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 10 Watt

Picasso has a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics and Radeon Picasso. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics
HD Graphics
AMD Radeon Picasso
Radeon Picasso

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 2743 votes

Rate HD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon Picasso on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics or Radeon Picasso, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.