ATI Radeon X800 XT Platinum AGP vs HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1357not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 6 Sandy Bridge (2011)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameSandy BridgeR420
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 May 2011 (14 years ago)1 May 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6no data
Core clock speed350 MHz520 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data160 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data63 Watt
Texture fill rateno data8.320
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data256 MB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data560 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data35.84 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.19.0b (9_2)
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2011 1 May 2004
Chip lithography 32 nm 130 nm

HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) and Radeon X800 XT Platinum AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X800 XT Platinum AGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
ATI Radeon X800 XT Platinum AGP
Radeon X800 XT Platinum AGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 98 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon X800 XT Platinum AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) or Radeon X800 XT Platinum AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.